www.nmgpsy.com内蒙古心理网
You have to have a big neurosis to be a Jungian analyst!!!
It takes a long time to release释放、解除 the Self the complexes.
In the meantime, I lived my life and started my psychiatry practice, etc.
I lived my life while I was undergoing经历 analysis. I didn't wait for the analysis to "work" to live my life. But the analysis helped me keep my complexes from ruining毁灭 my life until my own connection to/understanding of the Self was able to do that for me。 What is it mean to have a complex "ruin one's life"?
For one thing, a complex usually means you are living someone else's life, you are not living your own.
A mother complex means you are living your life as if you were your mother, or some better or worse mother than your mother
A father complex means you are living your life as if you were your father, or some better or worse father than your father. A money complex means you are living for money. A power complex means you are living for power. An inferiority劣势的 complex means you are living as if you were less powerful and less effective than others.
Ping 给所有人
what about death complex,john?
John Beebe 给所有人
A suicidal自杀 complex means you are always trying to find a way to end your life Catherine asked a question, ego psychology and Kohut's self psychology, and the big Self in Jungian psychology. ego, self, Self
Freud talks about ego
talks about self
Jung talks about Self
3 different ways of experiencing our own personality
ego is when we experience ourselves as effective有效的 in defending 防护ourself against impulses冲动、推进 and against shame and guilt.
Ego is making good and wise executive decisions about the living of our lives.
Many psychoanalysts and some Jungian analysts actually believe the whole point of psychotherapy is to get a better ego.
Freud, where id was, there ego shall be.
Ego-psychologists talk about coping stragegies, healthy defenses.
So where does the little s self come in And where does the big S self in. correction to last sentence: And were does the big S self fit in?
Let's start with the little "s" self, which is the topic that Heinz Kohut has done the most important work on.
Huaiqi 给所有人
国内把科胡特的self翻译为
John Beebe 给所有人
We have to realize there are times when we seem to get our ego tasks任务 done, we go to work, we cook dinner, we eat dinner, we go to sleep, but if we have a good friend, we confide that "I'm not feeling like myself today."
In other words, the ego is fine, but some part of the self is missing. If that continues, the morale to continue functioning in the world starts to disappear, and even though we could do things, we don't want to.
We say, we're not motivated. Or we're too anxious. Or we're depressed. Actually, if our lives depended on it we could go on functioning at the ego level.
But part of us in a lot of trouble. That part is the little s self.
In regular psychoanalysis, meaning Freudian model模型 psychoanalysis, the ego is actually unconscious a great deal of the time, just like the heart and lungs. But the little s self is preconscious,前的 meaning it has feelings. It can feel well or unwell. When the self feels unwell, it also strange to watch the ego go right on functioning as if nothing were happening.
I had an example of this the first time I gave a psychological lecture that began with the showing of a film. The film was Alfred Hitchcock's "Notorious" and it took 2 hours to show. Then we had lunch, and after lunch I discussed the film for four hours. To the best of my knowledge, no Jungian analyst had ever done a seminar like this.
The year was 1981.
I was absolutely terrified. What if people thought I was crazy to analyze a film? What if I didn't know enough? What if I had the psychology wrong?
What if I got the details of the film wrong--I have a weak sensation function?
What if I discussed women's experience in a sexist, stupid way that would offend the women in my audience? Since no one had ever done this before, how could I know I was doing it right?
I had a terrible headache, and an awful sense that I was going to make a fool of myself.
Yet later, when I listened to the tape of what I said, it was the coolest, clearest, most confident sounding presentation possible! You would think I was an absolute expert at this way of teaching.
The ego was fine. It was only the self that wasn't okay. So what was wrong. I was looking to my audience 观众for approval.赞成 But they had never been to a lecture演讲 like this before either.
They didn't know what I was going to do, so they couldn't reassure me that I was doing it right.
What we have here is the reason that most people don't allow themselves to be creative in public, because it's just too hard to do something new that doesn't give the chance to feel confident 确信的inside until long after. It's much easier to do things the way other people have taught you to do them. That way, other people already know what you're doing and can signal you that you're doing it okay. Kohut this "signalling发信号 to you that you're doing it okay," and also that you yourself are okay while doing it, the "mirroring" function that one person, or a group people provides to the self of the person acting.
Kohut's most important discovery was that the self requires other people's mirroring to function.
So he speaks in self psychology as follows: the self exists in a matrix母体、基质 of selfobjects.
A selfobject is somebody else, that is a person, who behaves in such a way that function as an extension of the self of someone. If even one person in that audience in 1981 had been able to function as extension of me and make me feel that I was teaching
psychology well by showing and analyzing the Hitchcock film, that one person would have been my selfobject, and my anxiety would have been so much less. But nobody could do that for me that day.
I was so surprised much later to learn how much people liked that seminar, and the tape was listened to over and over again by many people. But at the time, my self was lonely and anxious, because it could not experience the mirroring of anybody, When that happens, the little self will have spreading散布 anxiety and sometimes even rage.狂怒 It is so lonely!
Let me ask you if all you can relate 联系起来to that kind of self-experience of trying to function without mirroring, and if you know how subjectively painful that can be? I ask because that is one of the commonest ways we come to know the little s self.
Catherine 给所有人
自体-对象
Catherine 给所有人
another one
John Beebe 给所有人
Can everyone relate to my example enough to see, or feel, how the little s self is different from the ego.
Little s self John Beebe was in a state of chronic 慢性的、长期的anxiety for four hours of lecturing in 1981. Ego John Beebe had prepared very carefully and gave a perfect performance!
The ego was unconsciously competent to teach the seminar讨论会, even though it was a completely original, new way of teaching psychology at that time. But self John Beebe, meaning little s self John Beebe was terrified inside.
Have any of you had that experience?
Ego one thing, little s self quite another?
Talk to me!!
What part of me "needs" to hear from you?
Little s self, or ego?
工作人员 给所有人
yes, it do happens, and seems to be happened a lot. from Sophie
John Beebe 给所有人
The truth is, it happens to all of us every day!!
主持人 给所有人
mean that ego is more about the reality aspect, while the self is more about the internal feeling or unconciousness?
John Beebe 给所有人
Which person do you think John Beebe took to his psychotherapy, 'litte s' self or ego 。Actually, not quite. Because the ego, testing and functioning in reality, is often doing so more or less unconsciously, just as
lung breathes without our being aware that it is doing so. The ego deals with reality to some degree in an automatic way, based what it has learned to do. Once it has learned how to do something, the ego just does it. The self, on the other hand is not unconscious.
Suhang 给所有人
我小时候有一次爸妈不在家,我做了一锅饭,是想表现自己,结果等他们回来以后我没敢说是我做的,他们很奇怪为什么会有做好的饭,很害怕,就把饭倒了。到现在他们也不知道那是我干的事。
John Beebe 给所有人
You have to have a big neurosis to be a Jungian analyst!!!
It takes a long time to release释放、解除 the Self the complexes.
In the meantime, I lived my life and started my psychiatry practice, etc.
I lived my life while I was undergoing经历 analysis. I didn't wait for the analysis to "work" to live my life. But the analysis helped me keep my complexes from ruining毁灭 my life until my own connection to/understanding of the Self was able to do that for me。 What is it mean to have a complex "ruin one's life"?
For one thing, a complex usually means you are living someone else's life, you are not living your own.
A mother complex means you are living your life as if you were your mother, or some better or worse mother than your mother
A father complex means you are living your life as if you were your father, or some better or worse father than your father. A money complex means you are living for money. A power complex means you are living for power. An inferiority劣势的 complex means you are living as if you were less powerful and less effective than others.
Ping 给所有人
what about death complex,john?
John Beebe 给所有人
A suicidal自杀 complex means you are always trying to find a way to end your life Catherine asked a question, ego psychology and Kohut's self psychology, and the big Self in Jungian psychology. ego, self, Self
Freud talks about ego
talks about self
Jung talks about Self
3 different ways of experiencing our own personality
ego is when we experience ourselves as effective有效的 in defending 防护ourself against impulses冲动、推进 and against shame and guilt.
Ego is making good and wise executive decisions about the living of our lives.
Many psychoanalysts and some Jungian analysts actually believe the whole point of psychotherapy is to get a better ego.
Freud, where id was, there ego shall be.
Ego-psychologists talk about coping stragegies, healthy defenses.
So where does the little s self come in And where does the big S self in. correction to last sentence: And were does the big S self fit in?
Let's start with the little "s" self, which is the topic that Heinz Kohut has done the most important work on.
Huaiqi 给所有人
国内把科胡特的self翻译为
John Beebe 给所有人
We have to realize there are times when we seem to get our ego tasks任务 done, we go to work, we cook dinner, we eat dinner, we go to sleep, but if we have a good friend, we confide that "I'm not feeling like myself today."
In other words, the ego is fine, but some part of the self is missing. If that continues, the morale to continue functioning in the world starts to disappear, and even though we could do things, we don't want to.
We say, we're not motivated. Or we're too anxious. Or we're depressed. Actually, if our lives depended on it we could go on functioning at the ego level.
But part of us in a lot of trouble. That part is the little s self.
In regular psychoanalysis, meaning Freudian model模型 psychoanalysis, the ego is actually unconscious a great deal of the time, just like the heart and lungs. But the little s self is preconscious,前的 meaning it has feelings. It can feel well or unwell. When the self feels unwell, it also strange to watch the ego go right on functioning as if nothing were happening.
I had an example of this the first time I gave a psychological lecture that began with the showing of a film. The film was Alfred Hitchcock's "Notorious" and it took 2 hours to show. Then we had lunch, and after lunch I discussed the film for four hours. To the best of my knowledge, no Jungian analyst had ever done a seminar like this.
The year was 1981.
I was absolutely terrified. What if people thought I was crazy to analyze a film? What if I didn't know enough? What if I had the psychology wrong?
What if I got the details of the film wrong--I have a weak sensation function?
What if I discussed women's experience in a sexist, stupid way that would offend the women in my audience? Since no one had ever done this before, how could I know I was doing it right?
I had a terrible headache, and an awful sense that I was going to make a fool of myself.
Yet later, when I listened to the tape of what I said, it was the coolest, clearest, most confident sounding presentation possible! You would think I was an absolute expert at this way of teaching.
The ego was fine. It was only the self that wasn't okay. So what was wrong. I was looking to my audience 观众for approval.赞成 But they had never been to a lecture演讲 like this before either.
They didn't know what I was going to do, so they couldn't reassure me that I was doing it right.
What we have here is the reason that most people don't allow themselves to be creative in public, because it's just too hard to do something new that doesn't give the chance to feel confident 确信的inside until long after. It's much easier to do things the way other people have taught you to do them. That way, other people already know what you're doing and can signal you that you're doing it okay. Kohut this "signalling发信号 to you that you're doing it okay," and also that you yourself are okay while doing it, the "mirroring" function that one person, or a group people provides to the self of the person acting.
Kohut's most important discovery was that the self requires other people's mirroring to function.
So he speaks in self psychology as follows: the self exists in a matrix母体、基质 of selfobjects.
A selfobject is somebody else, that is a person, who behaves in such a way that function as an extension of the self of someone. If even one person in that audience in 1981 had been able to function as extension of me and make me feel that I was teaching
psychology well by showing and analyzing the Hitchcock film, that one person would have been my selfobject, and my anxiety would have been so much less. But nobody could do that for me that day.
I was so surprised much later to learn how much people liked that seminar, and the tape was listened to over and over again by many people. But at the time, my self was lonely and anxious, because it could not experience the mirroring of anybody, When that happens, the little self will have spreading散布 anxiety and sometimes even rage.狂怒 It is so lonely!
Let me ask you if all you can relate 联系起来to that kind of self-experience of trying to function without mirroring, and if you know how subjectively painful that can be? I ask because that is one of the commonest ways we come to know the little s self.
Catherine 给所有人
自体-对象
Catherine 给所有人
another one
John Beebe 给所有人
Can everyone relate to my example enough to see, or feel, how the little s self is different from the ego.
Little s self John Beebe was in a state of chronic 慢性的、长期的anxiety for four hours of lecturing in 1981. Ego John Beebe had prepared very carefully and gave a perfect performance!
The ego was unconsciously competent to teach the seminar讨论会, even though it was a completely original, new way of teaching psychology at that time. But self John Beebe, meaning little s self John Beebe was terrified inside.
Have any of you had that experience?
Ego one thing, little s self quite another?
Talk to me!!
What part of me "needs" to hear from you?
Little s self, or ego?
工作人员 给所有人
yes, it do happens, and seems to be happened a lot. from Sophie
John Beebe 给所有人
The truth is, it happens to all of us every day!!
主持人 给所有人
mean that ego is more about the reality aspect, while the self is more about the internal feeling or unconciousness?
John Beebe 给所有人
Which person do you think John Beebe took to his psychotherapy, 'litte s' self or ego 。Actually, not quite. Because the ego, testing and functioning in reality, is often doing so more or less unconsciously, just as
lung breathes without our being aware that it is doing so. The ego deals with reality to some degree in an automatic way, based what it has learned to do. Once it has learned how to do something, the ego just does it. The self, on the other hand is not unconscious.
Suhang 给所有人
我小时候有一次爸妈不在家,我做了一锅饭,是想表现自己,结果等他们回来以后我没敢说是我做的,他们很奇怪为什么会有做好的饭,很害怕,就把饭倒了。到现在他们也不知道那是我干的事。
John Beebe 给所有人